What the tool can do
- Keep exact release, use and user context in one record
- Connect evaluation, authority, canary, monitoring, incident and recovery evidence
- Preserve decision, conditions, dissent, owners, expiry and reopen triggers
FUURAA AI Knowledge Library · Downloadable record template
AI Agent Commissioning & Authority Handover Decision Record
Use fifteen fields to connect exact release identity, use, evaluation, authority, human control, canary evidence, independent decision and operating ownership in one expiring JSON. Entry, import and export stay in this device's browser.
Commissioning decision workspace
Make one decision cover the release object, real authority and transfer of responsibility.
Start blank or load the clearly labelled fictional demonstration. Completeness checks fields only; it cannot determine evidence authenticity, control effectiveness, safety or release suitability.
0%15 fields remain incomplete.
Freeze release and use
Identify the exact acting system and where it may—and may not—operate.
Reconcile evidence and dependencies
Show what covers this release, what remains unknown and what must escalate.
Bind authority and human control
Make least authority, recourse and recovery inspectable before release.
Bound canary and operating response
Carry predeclared gates into monitoring, incidents and emergency revocation.
Issue and hand over an expiring decision
Keep scope, conditions, dissent, separate owners and reopen triggers together.
JSON
Machine-readable commissioning decision record preview
JSON only saves and hands off this template. This structure is not an international standard and does not replace risk assessment, legal determination, audit, certification or independent authorisation.
{
"schema": "fuuraa.ai-agent-commissioning-decision-record/v1",
"release": {
"release_and_component_identity": "",
"intended_use_and_excluded_uses": "",
"users_tasks_languages_and_geography": ""
},
"evidence": {
"evaluation_package_and_unresolved_findings": "",
"provenance_and_dependency_manifest": "",
"rights_security_and_privacy_escalation_flags": ""
},
"authority_and_control": {
"authority_envelope_and_denied_actions": "",
"human_control_and_user_recourse": "",
"rollback_restore_and_fallback_evidence": ""
},
"canary_and_operation": {
"canary_design_and_results": "",
"monitoring_signals_and_thresholds": "",
"incident_and_emergency_revocation_route": ""
},
"decision_and_handover": {
"decision_conditions_and_dissent": "",
"release_and_operating_owners": "",
"effective_time_expiry_and_reopen_triggers": ""
}
}Applicability boundary
Field completeness does not mean an agent is safe or ready to release.
What the tool cannot prove
- That the inventory is complete, evidence authentic or no unknown dependency exists
- That controls work, rollback is viable or the canary supports release
- That any legal, sector, contractual, audit or certification requirement is met
FUURAA analysisCommissioning is not about producing a longer checklist. One expiring decision must bind the evaluated object, deployed release, real authority and the people accepting operating responsibility. Unknowns remain explicit; meeting notes, successful demos and green fields cannot replace independent judgement.
Primary sources and boundaries
Use primary frameworks to design an inspectable decision—not to impersonate operating proof.
Published 26 January 2023
NIST AI RMF 1.0
Connects governance, context, measurement and risk treatment across the AI lifecycle.
BoundaryVoluntary and use-case agnostic; it does not authorise a release or certify a deployment.
Open primary source ↗Final published 26 July 2024NIST SP 800-218A
Adds AI-specific secure-development practices for model producers, system producers and acquirers.
BoundarySecure-development guidance does not prove operating safety, control effectiveness or release suitability.
Open primary source ↗Published 27 November 2023UK NCSC · Secure deployment
Covers infrastructure and model protection, incident preparation, responsible release and usable guidance.
BoundaryHigh-level security guidance does not evaluate a particular agent, environment or decision.
Open primary source ↗Published 27 November 2023UK NCSC · Secure operation and maintenance
Connects behaviour and input monitoring, secure updates and lessons learned to deployed operation.
BoundaryIt does not set task-specific thresholds, sector duties or universal retention periods.
Open primary source ↗Draft EN dated September 2025ETSI EN 304 223 V2.0.0
Provides baseline cybersecurity requirements from design and deployment through maintenance and end of life.
BoundaryA baseline security standard is not a complete safety, privacy, sectoral or commissioning decision.
Open primary source ↗W3C Recommendation · 30 April 2013W3C PROV-DM
Models entities, activities, agents, time, derivation and responsibility for provenance.
BoundaryProvenance shows lineage; it does not prove truth, rights clearance or release suitability.
Open primary source ↗Method and evidence chain