What the tool can do
- Keep one exact system, revocation evidence, dependencies and owners together
- Separate evidence to preserve from data to dispose
- Import, copy and download handoff-ready JSON locally in the browser
FUURAA AI Knowledge Library · Browser-local tool
AI Agent Retirement Closure Record Builder
Turn authority revocation, evidence preservation, data disposition, successor handoff, independent verification and expiring closure into a fifteen-field JSON record. Entries are processed only in this browser page.
Retirement closure workspace
Five sections and fifteen fields show both closed authority and readable required evidence.
Start blank or load a clearly marked fictional example. Completion checks only field presence—not whether disposition, preservation or closure is valid.
0%15 fields remain incomplete.
Freeze the retirement object
Bind the decision to one exact system, reason, owner, window and dependency set.
Close authority and classify records
Separate denied action, justified preservation and bounded disposal.
Inventory assets and bound continuity
Name every location and prevent a successor from inheriting old authority by default.
Verify preservation, disposition and residuals
Show that required evidence remains readable while unwanted capability is unusable.
Issue an expiring closure
Closure is a reviewable decision with dissent, ownership and reopen conditions.
JSON
Machine-readable retirement closure record preview
The export uses RFC 8259 JSON. The structure is a FUURAA public method—not an international standard, legal retention schedule, forensic format, media-sanitisation proof, audit or certification format.
{
"schema": "https://fuuraa.com/schemas/ai-agent-retirement-closure-record/v1",
"scope": {
"retirement_object_and_reason": "",
"decision_owner_and_effective_window": "",
"dependency_and_affected_party_map": ""
},
"authority_and_records": {
"authority_revocation_evidence": "",
"preservation_classes_and_purposes": "",
"disposal_classes_and_methods": ""
},
"assets_and_continuity": {
"asset_and_storage_location_inventory": "",
"successor_scope_and_exclusions": "",
"migration_and_negative_action_tests": ""
},
"verification": {
"archive_readability_test": "",
"sanitisation_validation_evidence": "",
"residual_copies_and_unresolved_duties": ""
},
"closure": {
"independent_reviewer_and_dissent": "",
"closure_state_and_rationale": "",
"expiry_next_review_and_reopen_triggers": ""
}
}Applicability boundary
Structural completeness cannot prove safe, lawful or completed retirement.
What the tool cannot prove
- That authority is revoked, archives authentic and complete, disposition effective or residuals exhaustive
- That retention or deletion is lawful or meets litigation, privacy or contractual duties
- That media sanitisation, digital forensics, product safety, audit or certification conclusions are reached
FUURAA analysisA high-quality retirement record holds two opposing evidence sets together: one shows the system can no longer act; the other shows required material remains restorable, locatable and interpretable. Recording deletion without testing archives—or preserving archives without testing revoked authority—cannot support completed retirement.
Primary sources and boundaries
Use mature frameworks to design an inspectable record—not to impersonate retirement proof.
Published 26 January 2023
NIST · AI RMF 1.0
Frames lifecycle-wide governance, mapping, measurement and management of AI risk.
BoundaryIt does not prescribe a retirement record or certify closure.
Open primary source ↗Published 26 February 2024NIST · Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
Supports ownership, dependency, recovery and residual-risk decisions.
BoundaryHigh-level outcomes, not an AI-agent retirement procedure.
Open primary source ↗Published 27 November 2023UK NCSC · Secure operation and maintenance
Connects monitoring, updates, remediation and lessons learned for deployed AI systems.
BoundaryIt does not determine lawful retention or disposal in a specific context.
Open primary source ↗Final 26 September 2025NIST · SP 800-88 Rev. 2
Guides enterprise media-sanitisation programmes and validation.
BoundaryThis tool does not select or validate a sanitisation method for any real asset.
Open primary source ↗Recommendation 30 April 2013W3C · PROV-DM
Models entities, activities, agents, derivation, time and responsibility for provenance.
BoundaryA provenance model is not proof that an archive is authentic, complete or lawfully retained.
Open primary source ↗Published December 2017IETF · RFC 8259
Defines the JSON interchange format used by the local export.
BoundaryValid JSON says nothing about the truth, integrity or sufficiency of its contents.
Open primary source ↗Method and evidence chain