Inspection
Validate coverage, calibration and anomaly thresholds.
Real-work map · 11
Inspection with intervention
Separate sensing and diagnosis from the authority to touch, reset, turn, open or move equipment.
Evidence statusEngineering evidence framework · task and site validation requiredLast reviewed: 14 August 2026
11
FUURAA thesis
Physical intervention changes an information task into a contact and process-safety task.
Engineering map
Turn the title into engineering objects that can be observed, measured and reviewed.
Each layer states the boundary to establish and the evidence needed for the next decision.
Decision
Define who confirms diagnosis and action.
Intervention
Control contact, energy state and post-action verification.
Verification questions
Write the questions first, then decide whether a demo, test, pilot or operating record can answer them.
Each question needs an object, conditions, denominator, threshold and accountable decision owner.
- 01
Can inspection evidence stand without intervention?
- 02
Who authorises physical action?
- 03
What hazardous energy is present?
- 04
How is the final equipment state verified?
Evidence to preserve
Enable the next reader to reconstruct conditions, results, failures and the decision.
A conclusion alone loses reviewability; raw records, configuration and exclusions matter too.
- 01
Evidence package 1
Calibrated inspection record
- 02
Evidence package 2
Action authorisation record
- 03
Evidence package 3
Before-and-after state verification
Scope boundary
State what this evidence still cannot be generalised to.
- 01
Detecting an anomaly does not authorise or validate a physical remedy.
- 02
This is an engineering reading and decision framework; it does not replace application-specific risk assessment, conformity work, procurement acceptance or professional advice.
Sources and evidence status
Read standards scope, measurement evidence and application conclusions separately.
Source dates and review status remain visible; external sources open in a new tab.
01
NIST · Updated 2024-08-16 · verified 2026-08-14
↗02Standard test methods for response robots
Develops repeatable measures for mobility, manipulation, sensing, endurance, communications, operator proficiency, logistics and safety.
ISO · 2025-02
↗ISO 10218-2:2025 — Industrial robot applications and robot cells
Covers integration, commissioning, operation, maintenance and decommissioning of industrial robot applications and cells.