Input
Specify patient data, imaging, instruments and operator commands.
System anatomy · 05
Translate robotic positioning, navigation, manipulation or assistance into a bounded clinical function and measurable output.
FUURAA thesis
Engineering map
Each layer states the boundary to establish and the evidence needed for the next decision.
Specify patient data, imaging, instruments and operator commands.
Separate sensing, recommendation, constraint, execution and monitoring.
Define accuracy, uncertainty, timing and required clinician interpretation.
Verification questions
Each question needs an object, conditions, denominator, threshold and accountable decision owner.
What function is medically necessary?
What does the robot not decide?
How is uncertainty shown?
Which failure changes care?
Evidence to preserve
A conclusion alone loses reviewability; raw records, configuration and exclusions matter too.
Function-and-claim specification
Input-output verification
Clinical interpretation protocol
Scope boundary
More degrees of freedom or algorithmic sophistication does not establish a broader medical claim.
This is an engineering reading and decision framework; it does not replace application-specific risk assessment, conformity work, procurement acceptance or professional advice.
Sources and evidence status
Source dates and review status remain visible; external sources open in a new tab.
Explains authorised uses, clinician control, training, credentialing, facility responsibilities and adverse-event reporting for computer-assisted surgery.
Connects valid clinical association, technical performance and clinical performance to a documented evaluation under the applicable regulation.
Calls for classification guidance for surgical and rehabilitation robots, naming consensus, standards work and lifecycle regulatory support.