Link
Map line-of-sight, non-line-of-sight, latency, throughput and dead zones.
System anatomy · 07
Define safe behaviour when radio, map, positioning or remote services weaken together.
FUURAA thesis
Engineering map
Each layer states the boundary to establish and the evidence needed for the next decision.
Map line-of-sight, non-line-of-sight, latency, throughput and dead zones.
Test map change, darkness, reflective surfaces, dust and loop-closure error.
Specify pause, retreat, return, sit, continue or request-assistance logic.
Verification questions
Each question needs an object, conditions, denominator, threshold and accountable decision owner.
What fails first in the real route?
Can the operator distinguish link loss from localisation loss?
Is the fallback safe at that location?
How is mission state recovered?
Evidence to preserve
A conclusion alone loses reviewability; raw records, configuration and exclusions matter too.
Radio and localisation survey
Injected degradation test
Fallback and resumption log
Scope boundary
A successful recorded route does not prove safe behaviour during coupled communications and localisation failures.
This is an engineering reading and decision framework; it does not replace application-specific risk assessment, conformity work, procurement acceptance or professional advice.
Sources and evidence status
Source dates and review status remain visible; external sources open in a new tab.
Defines repeatable measures across mobility, sensing, endurance, communications, autonomy, logistics, safety and operator proficiency; mission profiles combine multiple elemental tests.
Teams deployed autonomous systems to map, navigate and identify artifacts in unfamiliar tunnel, urban-underground and cave environments.
Documents mechanical, electrical, software, service-fault and time-synchronisation requirements for integrating sensing and manipulation payloads.