System anatomy · 05

Legged mobility and whole-body control

Evaluate perception, state estimation, foothold selection, balance and recovery as one coupled control loop.

Evidence statusField mission framework · task, terrain and site validation requiredLast reviewed: 15 August 2026
05

FUURAA thesis

A strong nominal gait is not robust locomotion unless uncertainty and disturbance are tested.

Engineering map

Turn the title into engineering objects that can be observed, measured and reviewed.

Each layer states the boundary to establish and the evidence needed for the next decision.

01

State

Measure estimator error under slip, impact, darkness, dust and sensor disagreement.

02

Contact

Test foothold geometry, friction, compliance and negative obstacles.

03

Recovery

Demonstrate stop, stabilisation, self-righting or assisted retrieval after loss of balance.

Verification questions

Write the questions first, then decide whether a demo, test, pilot or operating record can answer them.

Each question needs an object, conditions, denominator, threshold and accountable decision owner.

  1. 01

    Which disturbance defines failure?

  2. 02

    How does payload shift the stability margin?

  3. 03

    What happens after estimator disagreement?

  4. 04

    Can recovery create a new hazard?

Evidence to preserve

Enable the next reader to reconstruct conditions, results, failures and the decision.

A conclusion alone loses reviewability; raw records, configuration and exclusions matter too.

  1. 01

    Evidence package 1

    Repeated terrain score distribution

  2. 02

    Evidence package 2

    Estimator and contact fault log

  3. 03

    Evidence package 3

    Fall and recovery demonstration

Scope boundary

State what this evidence still cannot be generalised to.

Sources and evidence status

Read standards scope, measurement evidence and application conclusions separately.

Source dates and review status remain visible; external sources open in a new tab.