State
Measure estimator error under slip, impact, darkness, dust and sensor disagreement.
System anatomy · 05
Evaluate perception, state estimation, foothold selection, balance and recovery as one coupled control loop.
FUURAA thesis
Engineering map
Each layer states the boundary to establish and the evidence needed for the next decision.
Measure estimator error under slip, impact, darkness, dust and sensor disagreement.
Test foothold geometry, friction, compliance and negative obstacles.
Demonstrate stop, stabilisation, self-righting or assisted retrieval after loss of balance.
Verification questions
Each question needs an object, conditions, denominator, threshold and accountable decision owner.
Which disturbance defines failure?
How does payload shift the stability margin?
What happens after estimator disagreement?
Can recovery create a new hazard?
Evidence to preserve
A conclusion alone loses reviewability; raw records, configuration and exclusions matter too.
Repeated terrain score distribution
Estimator and contact fault log
Fall and recovery demonstration
Scope boundary
Simulation, domain randomisation and a single real-robot run do not exhaust long-tail controller failures.
This is an engineering reading and decision framework; it does not replace application-specific risk assessment, conformity work, procurement acceptance or professional advice.
Sources and evidence status
Source dates and review status remain visible; external sources open in a new tab.
Uses reconfigurable grating, hills, holes and search targets to measure locomotion and inspection together under increasing difficulty.
Shows that low-magnitude sequential disturbances can expose failures in robust locomotion policies and that domain randomisation alone is insufficient.
Publishes configuration-dependent figures for speed, load, endurance, stairs, environmental rating, sensors and development interfaces.