System anatomy · 07

Fleet orchestration and observability

Task allocation, traffic control, charging and WMS/WES integration must remain understandable during congestion and faults.

Evidence statusDeployment decision framework · site and workflow validation requiredLast reviewed: 14 August 2026
07

FUURAA thesis

An interoperable message is useful only when state, authority and recovery semantics are also clear.

Engineering map

Turn the title into engineering objects that can be observed, measured and reviewed.

Each layer states the boundary to establish and the evidence needed for the next decision.

01

State

Expose robot, order, zone, battery and fault state.

02

Authority

Define who assigns, pauses, cancels and releases work.

03

Recovery

Reconcile duplicate, stale and partially completed orders.

Verification questions

Write the questions first, then decide whether a demo, test, pilot or operating record can answer them.

Each question needs an object, conditions, denominator, threshold and accountable decision owner.

  1. 01

    Which system is the source of truth?

  2. 02

    How are stale states detected?

  3. 03

    Can two controllers issue conflicting work?

  4. 04

    What remains operable during network loss?

Evidence to preserve

Enable the next reader to reconstruct conditions, results, failures and the decision.

A conclusion alone loses reviewability; raw records, configuration and exclusions matter too.

  1. 01

    Evidence package 1

    System authority and state model

  2. 02

    Evidence package 2

    Interface conformance and semantic tests

  3. 03

    Evidence package 3

    Congestion, outage and reconciliation drills

Scope boundary

State what this evidence still cannot be generalised to.

Sources and evidence status

Read standards scope, measurement evidence and application conclusions separately.

Source dates and review status remain visible; external sources open in a new tab.