Modes
Describe conventional, remotely controlled and autonomous functions and transitions.
Real-work map · 12
Define ship functions, operating modes, master and remote-centre responsibilities, coexistence and equivalent safety.
FUURAA thesis
Engineering map
Each layer states the boundary to establish and the evidence needed for the next decision.
Describe conventional, remotely controlled and autonomous functions and transitions.
Assign the master, onboard crew, remote operators and shore organisation.
Address approval, safety management, cybersecurity, connectivity and search and rescue.
Verification questions
Each question needs an object, conditions, denominator, threshold and accountable decision owner.
Does the ship hold the applicable MASS approval?
Who is master in every mode?
How is the remote centre assured?
Can conventional traffic understand its behaviour?
Evidence to preserve
A conclusion alone loses reviewability; raw records, configuration and exclusions matter too.
Approved concept and mode description
Responsibility and remote-centre assurance record
Safety-equivalence and coexistence evidence
Scope boundary
The 2026 MASS Code is non-mandatory and does not mean internationally trading crewless cargo ships are already in commercial operation.
This is an engineering reading and decision framework; it does not replace application-specific risk assessment, conformity work, procurement acceptance or professional advice.
Sources and evidence status
Source dates and review status remain visible; external sources open in a new tab.
Establishes a goal-based framework for MASS design, operation and certification, including modes, operational limits, remote centres, cybersecurity and human oversight.
Separates remote piloting from several autonomy levels and links supervision to traffic, hazards, weather, sensors, communications and recovery.