Mental model
Check whether users can predict motion, stop conditions and recovery consequences.
Deployment evaluation · 15
Test predictability, visibility, workload, trust, alarm meaning, intervention and restart with the people who perform the work.
FUURAA thesis
Engineering map
Each layer states the boundary to establish and the evidence needed for the next decision.
Check whether users can predict motion, stop conditions and recovery consequences.
Measure attention, waiting, awkward reach, repetition, pace and alarm burden.
Include workers in design, testing, change review, incident learning and training.
Verification questions
Each question needs an object, conditions, denominator, threshold and accountable decision owner.
Can users tell why the robot slowed or stopped?
Does the cell shift physical burden into monitoring burden?
Are instructions usable under time pressure?
How are worker concerns captured and resolved?
Evidence to preserve
A conclusion alone loses reviewability; raw records, configuration and exclusions matter too.
Representative-user task observations
Workload, ergonomic and usability findings
Worker feedback, training and change-response record
Scope boundary
Training cannot compensate for poor design or replace engineering controls.
This is an engineering reading and decision framework; it does not replace application-specific risk assessment, conformity work, procurement acceptance or professional advice.
Sources and evidence status
Source dates and review status remain visible; external sources open in a new tab.
Frames robot adoption around worker safety, health and well-being, including people who use, wear or work near robots.
Highlights application hazard analysis, worker participation and risks during programming, testing, maintenance and recovery.