People
Compare training, consent, vulnerability and bystanders.
Scope boundary · 20
Reassess scope, people, supervision, contact, privacy and recovery before transferring a factory result to homes or public spaces.
FUURAA thesis
Engineering map
Each layer states the boundary to establish and the evidence needed for the next decision.
Compare training, consent, vulnerability and bystanders.
Compare access control, clutter, pets and change.
Determine applicable standards, validation and operations.
Verification questions
Each question needs an object, conditions, denominator, threshold and accountable decision owner.
Who enters without training?
Which factory controls disappear?
Does the applicable standard change?
What new evidence is required before transfer?
Evidence to preserve
A conclusion alone loses reviewability; raw records, configuration and exclusions matter too.
Environment and population gap analysis
Standards-scope determination
New-site validation and operating plan
Scope boundary
ISO 10218-2 excludes public-access service and consumer robots; ISO 13482 covers a different, bounded personal-care scope.
This is an engineering reading and decision framework; it does not replace application-specific risk assessment, conformity work, procurement acceptance or professional advice.
Sources and evidence status
Source dates and review status remain visible; external sources open in a new tab.
Covers integration, commissioning, operation, maintenance and decommissioning of industrial robot applications and cells.
Addresses mobile servant, physical assistant and person-carrier robots, including physical human–robot contact.
Separates the general-purpose vision from current application opportunities, limitations and regional strategies.