Physical form
Describe reach, mass, contact and infrastructure access.
Scope boundary · 19
Separate human-like proportions, hands and motion from judgement, dexterity, social understanding and responsibility.
FUURAA thesis
Engineering map
Each layer states the boundary to establish and the evidence needed for the next decision.
Describe reach, mass, contact and infrastructure access.
Bind claims to protocols and operating envelopes.
Test legibility, over-trust and role confusion.
Verification questions
Each question needs an object, conditions, denominator, threshold and accountable decision owner.
Which claim follows only from appearance?
What judgement remains with people?
Can bystanders understand limitations?
Does the interface invite unsafe trust?
Evidence to preserve
A conclusion alone loses reviewability; raw records, configuration and exclusions matter too.
Form-versus-capability claim map
Task-level measurement record
Human-expectation study
Scope boundary
Human-like hands and body proportions do not imply human-level judgement, dexterity or safe social behaviour.
This is an engineering reading and decision framework; it does not replace application-specific risk assessment, conformity work, procurement acceptance or professional advice.
Sources and evidence status
Source dates and review status remain visible; external sources open in a new tab.
Separates the general-purpose vision from current application opportunities, limitations and regional strategies.
Builds metrics and test methods for dexterity, control and contact safety rather than treating a demonstration as measurement.