Pilot question
State the decision, hypothesis, acceptance threshold, environment, duration, sample and exclusions before starting.
Scope boundary · 20
A pilot is not production proof
Separate bounded pilot evidence from multi-shift availability, maintenance, quality, change control and operating ownership.
Evidence statusEngineering decision framework · cell-specific validation requiredLast reviewed: 11 August 2026
20
FUURAA thesis
A pilot reduces selected uncertainties; it does not erase untested duration, variation, scale or organisational risk.
Engineering map
Turn the title into engineering objects that can be observed, measured and reviewed.
Each layer states the boundary to establish and the evidence needed for the next decision.
Production gap
List differences in mix, rate, shifts, staffing, interfaces, maintenance, cybersecurity, governance and customer consequence.
Scale gate
Require owners, support, spares, monitoring, change control, residual-risk acceptance and staged rollback before expansion.
Verification questions
Write the questions first, then decide whether a demo, test, pilot or operating record can answer them.
Each question needs an object, conditions, denominator, threshold and accountable decision owner.
- 01
Which uncertainty did the pilot actually test?
- 02
What production condition remained absent or curated?
- 03
Who owns incidents and performance after the project team leaves?
- 04
What evidence must accumulate before each scale step?
Evidence to preserve
Enable the next reader to reconstruct conditions, results, failures and the decision.
A conclusion alone loses reviewability; raw records, configuration and exclusions matter too.
- 01
Evidence package 1
Pre-registered pilot question, protocol and acceptance rule
- 02
Evidence package 2
Observed results including failures, exclusions and human support
- 03
Evidence package 3
Pilot-to-production gap register with owners and scale gates
Scope boundary
State what this evidence still cannot be generalised to.
- 01
A successful pilot supports only the tested conditions and decision; it is not evidence of unrestricted multi-site readiness.
- 02
This is an engineering reading and decision framework; it does not replace application-specific risk assessment, conformity work, procurement acceptance or professional advice.
Sources and evidence status
Read standards scope, measurement evidence and application conclusions separately.
Source dates and review status remain visible; external sources open in a new tab.
01
ISO · 2025-02
↗02ISO 10218-2:2025 — Industrial robot applications and robot cells
Addresses integration, commissioning, operation, maintenance and decommissioning of complete industrial robot applications and cells.
NIST · 2018-06-01
↗Quick health assessment for industrial robot degradation
Demonstrates measurement of tool-centre position and orientation degradation to support condition assessment.