Base
Validate stance, support polygon, compliance and slip during arm loading.
Real-work map · 12
Adding an arm turns locomotion into a contact task with new stability, force, visibility and recovery demands.
FUURAA thesis
Engineering map
Each layer states the boundary to establish and the evidence needed for the next decision.
Validate stance, support polygon, compliance and slip during arm loading.
Bound approach, force, tool alignment, entanglement and breakaway.
Expose teleoperation, autonomy, camera views, latency and abort authority.
Verification questions
Each question needs an object, conditions, denominator, threshold and accountable decision owner.
What physical state confirms success?
Can the robot release safely after a fault?
How does arm load change fall risk?
Who verifies the manipulated system?
Evidence to preserve
A conclusion alone loses reviewability; raw records, configuration and exclusions matter too.
Force, pose and outcome trace
Entanglement and abort test
Teleoperation and visibility record
Scope boundary
A manipulation demo on a prepared fixture cannot establish safe operation on live field equipment.
This is an engineering reading and decision framework; it does not replace application-specific risk assessment, conformity work, procurement acceptance or professional advice.
Sources and evidence status
Source dates and review status remain visible; external sources open in a new tab.
Defines repeatable measures across mobility, sensing, endurance, communications, autonomy, logistics, safety and operator proficiency; mission profiles combine multiple elemental tests.
Uses reconfigurable grating, hills, holes and search targets to measure locomotion and inspection together under increasing difficulty.
Documents mechanical, electrical, software, service-fault and time-synchronisation requirements for integrating sensing and manipulation payloads.