Real-work map · 12

Mobile manipulation in the field

Adding an arm turns locomotion into a contact task with new stability, force, visibility and recovery demands.

Evidence statusField mission framework · task, terrain and site validation requiredLast reviewed: 15 August 2026
12

FUURAA thesis

A reachable handle or valve is not a completed manipulation task until contact, outcome and release are controlled.

Engineering map

Turn the title into engineering objects that can be observed, measured and reviewed.

Each layer states the boundary to establish and the evidence needed for the next decision.

01

Base

Validate stance, support polygon, compliance and slip during arm loading.

02

Contact

Bound approach, force, tool alignment, entanglement and breakaway.

03

Control

Expose teleoperation, autonomy, camera views, latency and abort authority.

Verification questions

Write the questions first, then decide whether a demo, test, pilot or operating record can answer them.

Each question needs an object, conditions, denominator, threshold and accountable decision owner.

  1. 01

    What physical state confirms success?

  2. 02

    Can the robot release safely after a fault?

  3. 03

    How does arm load change fall risk?

  4. 04

    Who verifies the manipulated system?

Evidence to preserve

Enable the next reader to reconstruct conditions, results, failures and the decision.

A conclusion alone loses reviewability; raw records, configuration and exclusions matter too.

  1. 01

    Evidence package 1

    Force, pose and outcome trace

  2. 02

    Evidence package 2

    Entanglement and abort test

  3. 03

    Evidence package 3

    Teleoperation and visibility record

Scope boundary

State what this evidence still cannot be generalised to.

Sources and evidence status

Read standards scope, measurement evidence and application conclusions separately.

Source dates and review status remain visible; external sources open in a new tab.