Baseline
Measure the current service, quality, labour and risk cost.
Deployment evaluation · 17
Include facility work, integration, support, batteries, spares, training, downtime and vendor-exit costs.
FUURAA thesis
Engineering map
Each layer states the boundary to establish and the evidence needed for the next decision.
Measure the current service, quality, labour and risk cost.
Track capital, integration, operations, change and exit.
Attribute throughput, quality, resilience and safety outcomes.
Verification questions
Each question needs an object, conditions, denominator, threshold and accountable decision owner.
What costs sit outside the robot contract?
How sensitive is value to utilisation?
What happens after vendor or interface change?
Are safety and quality losses monetised transparently?
Evidence to preserve
A conclusion alone loses reviewability; raw records, configuration and exclusions matter too.
Comparable baseline and assumptions
Versioned total-cost model
Realised-benefit and sensitivity review
Scope boundary
A business case built from nominal throughput and full utilisation cannot establish realised return.
This is an engineering reading and decision framework; it does not replace application-specific risk assessment, conformity work, procurement acceptance or professional advice.
Sources and evidence status
Source dates and review status remain visible; external sources open in a new tab.
Defines exchange of order and status data between a central master control and mobile robots in intralogistics.
Enables AMRs from different vendors to share basic capability, location and operating-status information in a common environment.