Level-six engineering validation protocol · 02

Barkour vB actuator, STO and protected-motion protocol

A staged high-energy validation route from one identified actuator to a restrained stance test—without treating an open research release as a finished robot product.

Evidence statusHigh-energy research protocol · specialist facilities and independent safety review requiredPrimary sources checked 4 August 2026

Protocol scope

Define what will be evidenced—and what this protocol does not authorise.

For trained teams reproducing a declared Barkour vB hardware configuration in a controlled laboratory. It covers evidence planning from unpowered inspection through one-actuator and restrained low-energy system tests; it does not authorise free locomotion.

Configuration baseline

Before motion, freeze the physical system, software environment and operating envelope.

01

Generation and rights

Record

vB hardware variant, fixed or actuated head, repository commit, CAD/BOM/PCB revisions and the separate Apache-2.0 software versus CC BY-NC material boundaries.

Reject when

Do not combine v0 and vB assets or assume commercial rights from the software licence.

02

Energy architecture

Record

Power source, protection, STO chain, wireless stop, fusing, grounding, discharge, enclosure and responsible stop operator.

Reject when

No energisation until the independent stop path is verified without motion commands.

03

Actuator identity

Record

Motor, gearbox, driver PCB, firmware hash, EtherCAT identity, limits, sensing and assembly record for every module.

Reject when

Quarantine any module whose identity, calibration or protection cannot be reconciled.

Staged verification

Open only one new energy, motion or autonomy envelope at a time.

  1. 01 · Independent design review

    Advancement needs evidence; stopping needs an owner.
    Method

    Review mechanical retention, PCB/cable drawings, insulation, thermal paths, joint range, STO architecture and fixture design before assembly power-up.

    Evidence to preserve

    Signed hazard log, drawing revision list, calculated limits and review actions.

    Advance when

    All high-severity hazards have an implemented control and verification method.

    Stop immediately

    Uncontrolled stored energy, unclear isolation, missing fastener retention or unresolved wiring discrepancy.

  2. 02 · STO and communication dry run

    Advancement needs evidence; stopping needs an owner.
    Method

    With actuators mechanically disabled or disconnected from load, verify EtherCAT discovery, firmware identity, fault reporting and every local/remote stop path.

    Evidence to preserve

    Network inventory, state transitions, fault log and measured STO de-energisation response.

    Advance when

    Loss of command, communication or stop input reliably reaches the declared safe state.

    Stop immediately

    Any stop path depends on the same software process being tested or leaves torque enabled unexpectedly.

  3. 03 · One-actuator fixture test

    Advancement needs evidence; stopping needs an owner.
    Method

    Run one identified module in a rated fixture through low voltage/current, limited angle and speed while monitoring position, current and temperature.

    Evidence to preserve

    Fixture drawing, command/feedback traces, thermal record, limit events and post-test inspection.

    Advance when

    The module tracks bounded commands and enters the safe state under injected communication and stop faults.

    Stop immediately

    Oscillation, saturation, thermal rise beyond the declared bound, mechanical looseness or stop failure.

  4. 04 · Restrained multi-actuator integration

    Advancement needs evidence; stopping needs an owner.
    Method

    Integrate one leg, then the supported robot, with physical restraint and feet unloaded; validate sign, range, bus timing and fault propagation.

    Evidence to preserve

    Joint map, synchronisation trace, restraint design, current envelope and fault-injection results.

    Advance when

    All joints remain inside the declared low-energy envelope and coordinated stop removes commanded torque.

    Stop immediately

    Unexpected joint direction, bus instability, structural contact, restraint overload or asymmetric stop.

  5. 05 · Restrained stance evidence

    Advancement needs evidence; stopping needs an owner.
    Method

    Under an approved fixture and exclusion zone, transfer load gradually to a static stance; test only predefined low-amplitude pose changes and stop cases.

    Evidence to preserve

    Load path, fixture forces, joint/current/temperature traces, video, stop trials and inspection.

    Advance when

    Evidence may support this restrained stance configuration only; locomotion requires a new protocol and review.

    Stop immediately

    Loss of stance, increasing oscillation, abnormal sound/heat, fixture overload or any person entering the exclusion zone.

Acceptance claims

Every conclusion carries both a measurement and an applicability boundary.

01

Stop architecture is independently evidenced

How it is measured

Each stop and communication-loss case is exercised and tied to measured state and energy removal.

Claim boundary

This is not certification of a safety function.

02

One actuator is characterised

How it is measured

A specific module has bounded tracking, thermal and fault-response evidence in a rated fixture.

Claim boundary

One module does not establish fleet or lifetime performance.

03

Restrained stance is reviewable

How it is measured

Configuration, restraint, load transfer, raw traces, stop trials and deviations form one signed evidence pack.

Claim boundary

No inference to free gait, public operation or product compliance.

Evidence pack & boundaries

Enable the next engineer to review, reproduce, reject or approve the next step.

Minimum evidence pack

  • Generation, BOM, CAD, PCB, cable and firmware baseline
  • Hazard log, energy diagram and approved fixture drawings
  • STO, network and fault-injection records
  • Actuator and integrated-system raw traces
  • Post-test inspections, deviations and next-envelope decision

This protocol cannot replace

  • Not a construction instruction for unqualified operators
  • Not permission for untethered locomotion
  • Not commercial-use clearance for CC BY-NC design materials

FUURAA analysis

The reusable product is decision evidence—not one successful demonstration.

For a high-energy quadruped, technical depth means making the energy boundary visible. The correct progression is not assembly to running; it is identity, isolation, one actuator, restrained integration and only then a separately reviewed motion envelope.

Primary sources

The protocol starts with primary sources; every physical adoption still requires fresh validation.

Google DeepMind · Barkour RobotPrimary design, firmware, assembly, EtherCAT, STO and licence sourceGoogle DeepMind · MuJoCo Menagerie Barkour vBPrimary simulation model for geometry and configuration cross-checkingBarkour research paperOriginal benchmark and research context
Return to the related level-five technical dossier →