Start state
Fix object, robot, site and authority conditions.
Reading method · 03
Task sequence is the unit
Measure the complete chain from request and approach through manipulation, verification, handoff and return.
Evidence statusEngineering evidence framework · task and site validation requiredLast reviewed: 14 August 2026
03
FUURAA thesis
Isolated walking or grasping results cannot reveal compounded failure across a real work sequence.
Engineering map
Turn the title into engineering objects that can be observed, measured and reviewed.
Each layer states the boundary to establish and the evidence needed for the next decision.
Sequence
Record every transition, retry and branch.
Completion
Verify outcome, damage, time and final safe state.
Verification questions
Write the questions first, then decide whether a demo, test, pilot or operating record can answer them.
Each question needs an object, conditions, denominator, threshold and accountable decision owner.
- 01
What exactly starts and ends the task?
- 02
Which steps can be skipped or retried?
- 03
Where is human help allowed?
- 04
How are partial completions counted?
Evidence to preserve
Enable the next reader to reconstruct conditions, results, failures and the decision.
A conclusion alone loses reviewability; raw records, configuration and exclusions matter too.
- 01
Evidence package 1
Executable task protocol
- 02
Evidence package 2
Transition and exception log
- 03
Evidence package 3
Outcome verification record
Scope boundary
State what this evidence still cannot be generalised to.
- 01
A benchmark component score cannot be multiplied into an unmeasured end-to-end reliability claim.
- 02
This is an engineering reading and decision framework; it does not replace application-specific risk assessment, conformity work, procurement acceptance or professional advice.
Sources and evidence status
Read standards scope, measurement evidence and application conclusions separately.
Source dates and review status remain visible; external sources open in a new tab.
01
NIST · Updated 2024-08-16 · verified 2026-08-14
↗02Standard test methods for response robots
Develops repeatable measures for mobility, manipulation, sensing, endurance, communications, operator proficiency, logistics and safety.
NIST · Updated 2026-06-24 · verified 2026-08-14
↗Dexterous grasping, manipulation and contact-safety measurement
Builds metrics and test methods for dexterity, control and contact safety rather than treating a demonstration as measurement.