Application scope
Name the task, tool, workpiece, people, environment, operating modes and foreseeable misuse included in the claim.
Reading method · 04
Boundary
Keep standards, site conditions, product mix, operating modes and research maturity attached to every conclusion.
Evidence statusEngineering decision framework · cell-specific validation requiredLast reviewed: 11 August 2026
04
FUURAA thesis
A conclusion becomes unsafe when it travels farther than the conditions that produced it.
Engineering map
Turn the title into engineering objects that can be observed, measured and reviewed.
Each layer states the boundary to establish and the evidence needed for the next decision.
Evidence scope
State duration, sample size, variants, shifts, software version and excluded events beside the result.
Authority scope
Distinguish standards, regulatory obligations, supplier declarations, laboratory studies and site acceptance decisions.
Verification questions
Write the questions first, then decide whether a demo, test, pilot or operating record can answer them.
Each question needs an object, conditions, denominator, threshold and accountable decision owner.
- 01
Which users, environments and robot categories are explicitly excluded?
- 02
Does the cited standard cover the robot or the complete application?
- 03
What material change would invalidate the evidence?
- 04
Who is competent and authorised to accept residual risk?
Evidence to preserve
Enable the next reader to reconstruct conditions, results, failures and the decision.
A conclusion alone loses reviewability; raw records, configuration and exclusions matter too.
- 01
Evidence package 1
Claim-to-condition matrix with explicit exclusions
- 02
Evidence package 2
Standard applicability and jurisdiction review
- 03
Evidence package 3
Material-change triggers and revalidation record
Scope boundary
State what this evidence still cannot be generalised to.
- 01
This page supports technical reading; it is not legal advice, conformity certification or a site safety approval.
- 02
This is an engineering reading and decision framework; it does not replace application-specific risk assessment, conformity work, procurement acceptance or professional advice.
Sources and evidence status
Read standards scope, measurement evidence and application conclusions separately.
Source dates and review status remain visible; external sources open in a new tab.
01
ISO · 2025-02
↗02ISO 10218-1:2025 — Safety requirements for industrial robots
Defines robot-level safety requirements for industrial robots as partly completed machinery.
ISO · 2025-02
↗ISO 10218-2:2025 — Industrial robot applications and robot cells
Addresses integration, commissioning, operation, maintenance and decommissioning of complete industrial robot applications and cells.