Request
Handle language, noise, ambiguity and out-of-scope needs.
Real-work map · 11
Measure whether people reach the right place or service, including language, accessibility and staff escalation.
FUURAA thesis
Engineering map
Each layer states the boundary to establish and the evidence needed for the next decision.
Handle language, noise, ambiguity and out-of-scope needs.
Confirm pace, accessible route, arrival and handover.
Define escalation, queue ownership and correction.
Verification questions
Each question needs an object, conditions, denominator, threshold and accountable decision owner.
Did the person reach the service?
Who is excluded by assumptions?
How often does staff intervene?
Does the robot obstruct routes?
Evidence to preserve
A conclusion alone loses reviewability; raw records, configuration and exclusions matter too.
Request-to-arrival record
Accessibility findings
Staff-work measurements
Scope boundary
Engagement time and novelty feedback do not prove effective guidance.
This is an engineering reading and decision framework; it does not replace application-specific risk assessment, conformity work, procurement acceptance or professional advice.
Sources and evidence status
Source dates and review status remain visible; external sources open in a new tab.
Addresses safety management for service-robot applications in human spaces with trained and untrained people.
The proposed scope addresses service robots in personal and professional or commercial applications, including physical human–robot contact.