System anatomy · 06

Navigation in human spaces

Join map quality, localisation, obstacle handling, social yielding, accessibility and recovery.

Evidence statusService decision framework · site and user validation requiredLast reviewed: 14 August 2026
06

FUURAA thesis

Avoiding a test obstacle is not the same as moving safely and acceptably among people.

Engineering map

Turn the title into engineering objects that can be observed, measured and reviewed.

Each layer states the boundary to establish and the evidence needed for the next decision.

01

Performance

Measure pose, path deviation, narrow passage and mapping.

02

People

Challenge crowds, wheelchairs, children, pets and sudden reversal.

03

Infrastructure

Test lifts, doors, ramps, dead zones and fire routes.

Verification questions

Write the questions first, then decide whether a demo, test, pilot or operating record can answer them.

Each question needs an object, conditions, denominator, threshold and accountable decision owner.

  1. 01

    Which metrics are not safety claims?

  2. 02

    Where can the robot block access?

  3. 03

    How are unmapped changes handled?

  4. 04

    What happens after localisation loss?

Evidence to preserve

Enable the next reader to reconstruct conditions, results, failures and the decision.

A conclusion alone loses reviewability; raw records, configuration and exclusions matter too.

  1. 01

    Evidence package 1

    Route and interface record

  2. 02

    Evidence package 2

    Conditioned navigation results

  3. 03

    Evidence package 3

    Blocked-path and encounter logs

Scope boundary

State what this evidence still cannot be generalised to.

Sources and evidence status

Read standards scope, measurement evidence and application conclusions separately.

Source dates and review status remain visible; external sources open in a new tab.