Envelope
State floor, width, lighting, network, traffic and user conditions.
Scope boundary · 18
Mapped venue is not an arbitrary home
Keep claims inside the tested geometry, population, infrastructure and change rate.
Evidence statusService decision framework · site and user validation requiredLast reviewed: 14 August 2026
18
FUURAA thesis
Homes and public venues differ in clutter, thresholds, pets, routines, privacy and tolerance for failure.
Engineering map
Turn the title into engineering objects that can be observed, measured and reviewed.
Each layer states the boundary to establish and the evidence needed for the next decision.
Transfer gap
Compare geometry, infrastructure, privacy and behaviour.
Revalidation
Define mapping, challenge and acceptance before expansion.
Verification questions
Write the questions first, then decide whether a demo, test, pilot or operating record can answer them.
Each question needs an object, conditions, denominator, threshold and accountable decision owner.
- 01
Which conditions define the claim?
- 02
What differs at the new site?
- 03
Which users were absent?
- 04
What evidence is needed before transfer?
Evidence to preserve
Enable the next reader to reconstruct conditions, results, failures and the decision.
A conclusion alone loses reviewability; raw records, configuration and exclusions matter too.
- 01
Evidence package 1
Tested operating envelope
- 02
Evidence package 2
Site gap assessment
- 03
Evidence package 3
New-site acceptance record
Scope boundary
State what this evidence still cannot be generalised to.
- 01
Success in one mapped site cannot be generalised to arbitrary homes or public spaces.
- 02
This is an engineering reading and decision framework; it does not replace application-specific risk assessment, conformity work, procurement acceptance or professional advice.
Sources and evidence status
Read standards scope, measurement evidence and application conclusions separately.
Source dates and review status remain visible; external sources open in a new tab.
01
ISO · 2024-01
↗02ISO 18646-2:2024 — Navigation performance of service robots
Defines methods for pose accuracy, obstacle response, path deviation, narrow passage and mapping accuracy.
ISO · 2023-11
↗ISO 31101:2023 — Safety management for services provided by service robots
Addresses safety management for service-robot applications in human spaces with trained and untrained people.