Reading method · 02

Users, bystanders and environment

Map operators, recipients, visitors, children, pets and people with disabilities before defining normal use.

Evidence statusService decision framework · site and user validation requiredLast reviewed: 14 August 2026
02

FUURAA thesis

People who never chose the robot can still shape and bear its risk.

Engineering map

Turn the title into engineering objects that can be observed, measured and reviewed.

Each layer states the boundary to establish and the evidence needed for the next decision.

01

People

Identify users, bystanders, maintainers and vulnerable groups.

02

Environment

Record doors, lifts, stairs, clutter, noise, lighting and networks.

03

Behaviour

Include crowding, play, obstruction, curiosity and misuse.

Verification questions

Write the questions first, then decide whether a demo, test, pilot or operating record can answer them.

Each question needs an object, conditions, denominator, threshold and accountable decision owner.

  1. 01

    Who can enter without training or consent?

  2. 02

    Who cannot see, hear or reach the interface?

  3. 03

    How do children and pets change risk?

  4. 04

    Which changes invalidate the map?

Evidence to preserve

Enable the next reader to reconstruct conditions, results, failures and the decision.

A conclusion alone loses reviewability; raw records, configuration and exclusions matter too.

  1. 01

    Evidence package 1

    Stakeholder and bystander map

  2. 02

    Evidence package 2

    Site-condition envelope

  3. 03

    Evidence package 3

    Observed accessibility findings

Scope boundary

State what this evidence still cannot be generalised to.

Sources and evidence status

Read standards scope, measurement evidence and application conclusions separately.

Source dates and review status remain visible; external sources open in a new tab.