People
Identify users, bystanders, maintainers and vulnerable groups.
Reading method · 02
Map operators, recipients, visitors, children, pets and people with disabilities before defining normal use.
FUURAA thesis
Engineering map
Each layer states the boundary to establish and the evidence needed for the next decision.
Identify users, bystanders, maintainers and vulnerable groups.
Record doors, lifts, stairs, clutter, noise, lighting and networks.
Include crowding, play, obstruction, curiosity and misuse.
Verification questions
Each question needs an object, conditions, denominator, threshold and accountable decision owner.
Who can enter without training or consent?
Who cannot see, hear or reach the interface?
How do children and pets change risk?
Which changes invalidate the map?
Evidence to preserve
A conclusion alone loses reviewability; raw records, configuration and exclusions matter too.
Stakeholder and bystander map
Site-condition envelope
Observed accessibility findings
Scope boundary
Testing with trained adults in a quiet venue does not represent an open public space or home.
This is an engineering reading and decision framework; it does not replace application-specific risk assessment, conformity work, procurement acceptance or professional advice.
Sources and evidence status
Source dates and review status remain visible; external sources open in a new tab.
Addresses safety management for service-robot applications in human spaces with trained and untrained people.
The proposed scope addresses service robots in personal and professional or commercial applications, including physical human–robot contact.