Outcome
Specify quality, time, completeness, damage, dignity and access.
Reading method · 03
Define cleanliness, delivery integrity, guidance success or assistance quality before selecting robot metrics.
FUURAA thesis
Engineering map
Each layer states the boundary to establish and the evidence needed for the next decision.
Specify quality, time, completeness, damage, dignity and access.
Count abandoned, blocked, retried and manually finished requests.
Compare against the current service under equivalent demand.
Verification questions
Each question needs an object, conditions, denominator, threshold and accountable decision owner.
What counts as useful completion?
Are retries and manual finishes visible?
Which quality failures matter?
Is the baseline comparable?
Evidence to preserve
A conclusion alone loses reviewability; raw records, configuration and exclusions matter too.
Outcome specification
Complete request ledger
Comparable baseline measurements
Scope boundary
Pose accuracy, path completion or duration alone does not prove useful service.
This is an engineering reading and decision framework; it does not replace application-specific risk assessment, conformity work, procurement acceptance or professional advice.
Sources and evidence status
Source dates and review status remain visible; external sources open in a new tab.
Defines methods for pose accuracy, obstacle response, path deviation, narrow passage and mapping accuracy.
Addresses safety management for service-robot applications in human spaces with trained and untrained people.