Contacts
Identify impact, compression, drawing-in and secondary falls.
Deployment evaluation · 15
Test impact, crushing, pinching, hair and clothing entanglement, pet contact and manual release.
FUURAA thesis
Engineering map
Each layer states the boundary to establish and the evidence needed for the next decision.
Identify impact, compression, drawing-in and secondary falls.
Test speed, payload, floor friction, tool and body region.
Verify stop access, residual motion and responder instructions.
Verification questions
Each question needs an object, conditions, denominator, threshold and accountable decision owner.
Where can trapping persist after stop?
What draws in hair or clothing?
Can a bystander release safely?
How long does release take?
Evidence to preserve
A conclusion alone loses reviewability; raw records, configuration and exclusions matter too.
Contact hazard map
Worst-case test results
Timed release drill
Scope boundary
Emergency stop activation does not prove safe release from trapping.
This is an engineering reading and decision framework; it does not replace application-specific risk assessment, conformity work, procurement acceptance or professional advice.
Sources and evidence status
Source dates and review status remain visible; external sources open in a new tab.
Covers inherently safe design, protective measures and information for mobile servant, physical assistant and person-carrier robots.
Describes test methods supporting ISO 13482 and requires test selection and parameters to follow risk assessment.