Scope boundary · 19

Personal-care standard has limits

Check robot type, application, jurisdiction and publication status before citing ISO 13482.

Evidence statusService decision framework · site and user validation requiredLast reviewed: 14 August 2026
19

FUURAA thesis

A standard structures evidence; it does not certify every use or prove effectiveness.

Engineering map

Turn the title into engineering objects that can be observed, measured and reviewed.

Each layer states the boundary to establish and the evidence needed for the next decision.

01

Scope

Match the task to included and excluded categories.

02

Status

Distinguish the published 2014 standard from the final draft.

03

Evidence role

Separate design, tests, management and outcome evidence.

Verification questions

Write the questions first, then decide whether a demo, test, pilot or operating record can answer them.

Each question needs an object, conditions, denominator, threshold and accountable decision owner.

  1. 01

    Is the robot inside scope?

  2. 02

    Is the cited edition published?

  3. 03

    Which claim is supported?

  4. 04

    What work remains?

Evidence to preserve

Enable the next reader to reconstruct conditions, results, failures and the decision.

A conclusion alone loses reviewability; raw records, configuration and exclusions matter too.

  1. 01

    Evidence package 1

    Scope determination

  2. 02

    Evidence package 2

    Edition and status record

  3. 03

    Evidence package 3

    Claim-to-requirement matrix

Scope boundary

State what this evidence still cannot be generalised to.

Sources and evidence status

Read standards scope, measurement evidence and application conclusions separately.

Source dates and review status remain visible; external sources open in a new tab.